Over 10 years we helping companies reach their financial and branding goals. Onum is a values-driven SEO agency dedicated.

Big Data Cloud Cloud Migration

Cloud Storage and ETL Pricing: A Comparison of Azure, AWS, and GCP

Cloud Storage and ETL Pricing: A Comparison of Azure, AWS and GCP

Cloud Storage and ETL Pricing: A Comparison of Azure, AWS, and GCP

The cost of Azure Data Factory is generally equivalent to that of AWS Glue and Google Cloud Dataflow, but there are several important distinctions. Performance needs and financial constraints must be taken into account when selecting the best storage alternatives for your data in cloud platforms like Azure, GCP, and AWS. According to certain use cases, each platform provides a variety of storage services. In addition to a general pricing overview, the following table breaks down popular storage options and the appropriate data types for each:

Pricing Details

Azure Data Factory

  • Pipeline orchestration and execution: $1 per 1,000 runs
  • Data flow execution and debugging: $0.168 per hour
  • Number of Data Factory operations: $0.00010 per operation
  • Inactive pipelines: $0.80 per month

AWS Glue

  • ETL jobs: $0.29  per second of processing time
  • Data stores: $0.00025 per GB of data processed
  • Storage: $0.023 per GB of data stored
  • Idle jobs: $0.00025 per second of idle time

Google Cloud Dataflow

  • Workers: $0.05 per vCPU-hour
  • Storage: $0.023 per GB of data stored
  • Network egress: $0.04 per GB of data egress

Pricing comparison

Here is a table comparing the pricing of Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, and Google Cloud Dataflow for a simple data pipeline that copies data from an on-premises SQL Server database to an Azure Blob storage container and transforms the data using a data flow:


As you can see, the pricing for all three services is very similar for this simple data pipeline. However, there are some key differences to keep in mind. For example, Azure Data Factory charges a monthly fee for inactive pipelines, while AWS Glue and Google Cloud Dataflow do not.

Cloud Storage Options for Files, SQL, and NoSQL Data: Azure, AWS, and GCP

In the ever-evolving cloud computing landscape, choosing the right storage solutions for your data is essential. Each of the major cloud providers—Azure, AWS, and GCP—offers a diverse range of storage services tailored to specific data types and workloads. This comprehensive guide will explore the cloud storage options available on these platforms for files, SQL databases, and NoSQL databases.


  • Files: Azure Blob Storage, Azure Files
  • SQL: Azure SQL Database, Azure SQL Managed Instance
  • NoSQL: Azure Cosmos DB, Azure Table Storage


  • Files: Amazon S3, Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)
  • SQL: Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), Amazon Aurora
  • NoSQL: Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)


  • Files: Google Cloud Storage (GCS), Cloud Filestore
  • SQL: Cloud SQL, Cloud Spanner
  • NoSQL: Cloud Firestore, Cloud Bigtable

Suitable Storage for Files, SQL, and NoSQL Data

  • Files: Azure Blob Storage, AWS S3, and GCP GCS are all good options for storing files. They offer high scalability, durability, and availability.
  • SQL: Azure SQL Database, AWS RDS, and GCP Cloud SQL are all good options for storing SQL data. They offer a variety of features and performance options, and they are tightly integrated with their respective cloud platforms.
  • NoSQL: Azure Cosmos DB, AWS DynamoDB, and GCP Cloud Firestore are all good options for storing NoSQL data. They offer flexible data models and scalability, and they are well-suited for applications such as mobile, gaming, and IoT.

Here are some specific recommendations for each type of data

  • Files: If you need to store a large amount of files, such as backups or media files, Azure Blob Storage or AWS S3 are good options. If you need to provide file shares to users, Azure Files or AWS EFS are good options.
  • SQL: If you need a relational database with a high degree of performance and availability, Azure SQL Database or AWS Aurora are good options. If you need a database that is highly scalable and cost-effective, Azure SQL Managed Instance or AWS RDS for PostgreSQL are good options.
  • NoSQL: If you need a database with a flexible data model and scalability, Azure Cosmos DB or AWS DynamoDB are good options. If you need a database that is well-suited for mobile, gaming, or IoT applications, GCP Cloud Firestore or GCP Cloud Bigtable are good options.

Various elements, including data access patterns, performance needs, financial limitations, and the particular use case, must be taken into consideration while selecting the best storage option. Consider performing a cost-performance study to evaluate your storage options and make sure you’re getting the best value for your cloud storage requirements.Your particular demands and objectives will ultimately determine the best option for data storage.



harshlata hurmade

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *